Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for non-disclosure of long-term capital gain in the return where the omission was claimed to be bona fide and the income was held not taxable in the relevant year.
Analysis: The assessee had not offered the capital gain in the return on the stated belief that taxability would arise only on completion of the project. The transaction was examined in the light of section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and it was held that the transfer took place in an earlier assessment year, so the amount was not chargeable in the year under appeal. Penalty can arise only where there is concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. On the facts, the omission was not found to be deliberate or wilful, and the explanation of bona fide mistake was not rejected.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable, and the addition was directed to be deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars cannot be imposed where the omission is bona fide and the income is not chargeable to tax in the relevant year.