Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for want of proper service of notice and violation of natural justice, and whether the matter required remand for fresh assessment.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on the alleged non-response to the notice of proposal. The first notice was not disputed, but the later notices were specifically denied as having been served. The authority did not produce acknowledgment or returned postal cover to establish service of the notice dated 22.04.2019. In the absence of proof of service, the assessment could not be sustained as having been passed after affording a proper opportunity. At the same time, the merits of the exemption claim were left open for consideration by the Assessing Officer on the basis of documents to be produced by the petitioner.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity to file objections and documents.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained procedural relief through remand, while the substantive claim was left to be decided afresh by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment based on alleged non-response to notice cannot be sustained unless due service of the notice is proved, and failure to establish service amounts to denial of natural justice warranting remand.