National Company Law Tribunal upholds Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code application, appoints Resolution Professional

The National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, upheld the application under section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code filed by the State Bank of India against M/s. Sri Bir Ispat Private Limited. The Tribunal admitted the application, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional to oversee the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. This decision aims to facilitate the resolution process and protect the interests of creditors and stakeholders involved in the insolvency proceedings due to the Corporate Debtor's default and non-compliance with loan agreements.

---

---

Issues:
Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code based on default by the Corporate Debtor.

Analysis:
The judgment delivered by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench involved the application under section 7 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code filed by the State Bank of India, the Financial Creditor, seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against M/s. Sri Bir Ispat Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The Financial Creditor had granted loans and credit facilities to the Corporate Debtor, who subsequently failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreements, leading to default. Despite multiple reminders and legal notices, the Corporate Debtor did not make the payments, resulting in the account being declared as Non-Performing Asset (NPA). The Financial Creditor pursued legal actions, including initiating proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, which issued a Recovery Certificate in favor of the Financial Creditor. The Financial Creditor submitted various documents to substantiate the default, including statements of accounts, AUCA Statements, CIBIL Report, and Balance Sheets of the Corporate Debtor.

The Corporate Debtor, in response, disputed the allegations, claiming that the Financial Creditor had adjusted the sanctioned amount in another account without consent, leading to financial losses. The Corporate Debtor alleged high-handedness and mala fide intentions on the part of the Financial Creditor, stating that the claim was exorbitant and baseless. After hearing arguments from both parties, the Tribunal found that the Financial Creditor had proven its case, especially with the issuance of the Recovery Certificate by the DRT. The Corporate Debtor's counsel did not oppose the petition, and the claim was admitted by the Tribunal. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the application, declared a moratorium under section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional to oversee the process. The Tribunal directed the IRP to convene a meeting of the Committee of Creditors and identify a prospective Resolution Applicant within a specified timeline.

In conclusion, the judgment upheld the application for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor based on the default and non-compliance with loan agreements. The Tribunal's decision to declare a moratorium and appoint an Interim Resolution Professional aims to facilitate the resolution process and protect the interests of creditors and stakeholders involved in the insolvency proceedings.

---