Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed during the pendency of the writ petition should be stayed for a limited period and whether coercive steps pursuant to that order should be restrained.
Analysis: The writ petition was entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in a challenge relating to proceedings under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015. As the assessment order was passed after filing of the writ petition and the matter required proper hearing with assistance of counsel, the Court granted limited interim protection. It restrained the authorities from taking coercive steps and stayed the assessment order only to prevent the limitation period for filing an appeal from expiring. The question of maintainability was expressly left open.
Conclusion: Interim stay was granted in favour of the petitioner and coercive action pursuant to the assessment order was restrained for the period directed by the Court.