Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (3) TMI 1102 - SC - FEMA

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Dismissed appeal upholds penalties for contravention of FEMA Act, MD's liability for ongoing offences The appeal was dismissed, affirming penalties imposed on the Company and the appellant for contravention of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act. The Court held ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Dismissed appeal upholds penalties for contravention of FEMA Act, MD's liability for ongoing offences

                          The appeal was dismissed, affirming penalties imposed on the Company and the appellant for contravention of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act. The Court held the appellant, as Managing Director, responsible for the continued offence post-management change, emphasizing his failure to rectify the situation despite awareness. The judgment highlighted the liability of the person in charge for ongoing contraventions, dismissing arguments of non-responsibility for initial breaches.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Prima facie contravention of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act.
                          2. Responsibility for the contravention post-management change.
                          3. Applicability of Section 42 of the FEMA Act regarding contravention by companies.
                          4. Nature of the contravention as a continuing offence.
                          5. Liability of the Managing Director for actions of the company.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Prima Facie Contravention of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act:
                          The adjudicating authority issued a show-cause notice on 19.5.2004, indicating a prima facie contravention of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act. The Company had imported goods but failed to submit the Bill of Entry and did not take delivery, resulting in the goods being kept in a bonded warehouse. This was deemed a violation, warranting the issuance of a show-cause notice. The adjudicating authority concluded that both the Company and its Managing Director were guilty of the charge and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 each.

                          2. Responsibility for the Contravention Post-Management Change:
                          The appellant argued that he took over the management of the Company in July 2002 and was not responsible for the initial contravention. However, the appellate authority noted that the appellant was aware of the imported goods and the need to clear them from the warehouse. Despite financial constraints, the appellant failed to take necessary steps to rectify the situation, leading to the continued contravention of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act.

                          3. Applicability of Section 42 of the FEMA Act Regarding Contravention by Companies:
                          Section 42 of the FEMA Act states that every person in charge of and responsible to the company at the time of the contravention is deemed guilty. The appellant argued that he was not in charge at the time of the initial contravention. However, the High Court held that the contravention was a continuing offence, and the appellant, being in charge of the Company post-2001, was responsible for taking corrective measures, which he failed to do.

                          4. Nature of the Contravention as a Continuing Offence:
                          The High Court opined that the contravention was a continuing offence, as the obligation to submit the Bill of Entry and clear the goods from the warehouse remained unfulfilled. The contravention continued until corrective steps were taken. The Court cited the case of Chairman, SEBI Vs. Shriram Mutual Fund & Anr. to emphasize that mens rea is not essential for imposing a penalty for breach of civil obligations.

                          5. Liability of the Managing Director for Actions of the Company:
                          The appellant, as the Managing Director post-2001, was held liable for the continued contravention. The Court noted that the appellant was aware of the contravention and failed to take corrective measures. The appellant's argument that he was not responsible for the initial contravention was dismissed, as the contravention continued during his tenure. The Court emphasized that the appellant did not exercise due diligence to prevent or rectify the contravention, making him liable under Section 42 of the FEMA Act.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalties imposed on the Company and the appellant. The Court held that the appellant, as the Managing Director, was responsible for the continued contravention of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act and failed to take necessary corrective measures. The judgment emphasized the nature of the contravention as a continuing offence and the liability of the person in charge of the company's affairs.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found