Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a reassessment for the assessment year 1959-60, the assessee was entitled to insist that the opening stock should also be revalued when the closing stock had been revalued for under-valuation.
Analysis: The applicable principle is that real profits cannot be correctly ascertained if both opening and closing stocks are undervalued and only the closing stock is adjusted. However, the assessee himself filed a revised return in response to the reopening notice and revalued only the closing stock, without seeking corresponding revaluation of the opening stock at the assessment stage. No such contention was raised before the Income-tax Officer, and the necessary material was not placed before the appellate authorities at the proper stage. In these circumstances, the claim for further adjustment was not permitted to be raised for the first time in appeal.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to revaluation of the opening stock for the assessment year 1959-60, and the addition made on account of under-valuation of the closing stock was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee, in a reassessment proceeding, accepts revaluation only of the closing stock in a revised return and does not seek corresponding adjustment of the opening stock at the proper stage, the revenue authorities are justified in confining the reassessment to the revised figure adopted by the assessee.