Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2020 (3) TMI 306 - Commission - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Bench Imposes Penalty and Grants Immunity in Central Excise and Customs Case The Bench settled the case by imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on M/s. Royal Touch Fablon Pvt. Ltd. (Unit-I) and granting full immunity from penalties ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Bench Imposes Penalty and Grants Immunity in Central Excise and Customs Case

                            The Bench settled the case by imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on M/s. Royal Touch Fablon Pvt. Ltd. (Unit-I) and granting full immunity from penalties to co-applicants Shri Vikas Kandoi, Shri Raj Kr. Jaisansaria, and Shri Pawan Sharma. Immunity from prosecution under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Customs Act, 1962, was extended to all co-applicants upon payment by co-applicant No. 1 within 30 days. The immunities are subject to withdrawal if material particulars are withheld or false evidence is provided.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Settlement of Central Excise and Customs duty evasion.
                            2. Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties.
                            3. Applicability of Section 32-O of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
                            4. Immunity from penalties and prosecution.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Settlement of Central Excise and Customs Duty Evasion:
                            The main applicant, M/s. Royal Touch Fablon Pvt. Ltd. (Unit-IV), was found to have evaded Central Excise duty and Customs duty through unlawful manufacture, clandestine removal of finished goods, illegal diversion of raw materials, and unauthorized shifting of capital goods to their DTA Unit (Unit-I). The Settlement Commission settled the case with the applicant under specific terms, including settling Central Excise duty at Rs. 13,45,257/- on finished goods, Rs. 7,38,995/- on 20 looms after depreciation, and Customs duty at Rs. 7,47,335/- on raw materials. Confiscation orders were issued for various goods, with redemption fines imposed. A penalty of Rs. 50,000/- was imposed on the applicant, with immunity granted from further penalties.

                            2. Confiscation of Goods and Imposition of Penalties:
                            The show cause notice (SCN) issued to M/s. Royal Touch Fablon Pvt. Ltd. (Unit-IV) and co-applicants proposed the confiscation of finished goods, capital goods, and raw materials, and demanded Customs and Central Excise duties along with interest. Penalties were proposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commission ordered confiscation and allowed redemption of the goods on payment of fines. The co-applicants were also called upon to show cause why penalties should not be imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, read with Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962.

                            3. Applicability of Section 32-O of the Central Excise Act, 1944:
                            The co-applicant No. 1, M/s. Royal Touch Fablon Pvt. Ltd. (Unit-I), had previously approached the Settlement Commission and was penalized Rs. 50,000/-. The Commission examined whether this earlier penalty barred the co-applicant from applying for settlement again under Section 32-O. The Commission concluded that the penalty in the previous order was of a general nature and not for concealment of particulars of duty liability. Therefore, the co-applicant was not barred from applying for settlement in the current case.

                            4. Immunity from Penalties and Prosecution:
                            The co-applicants requested immunity from penalties and prosecution, arguing that they had cooperated fully during the proceedings and that the main applicant had already been granted partial immunity. The Commission considered the cooperation and the full and true disclosure of duty liability by the main applicant. The Commission granted full immunity from penalties to co-applicants No. 2 (Shri Vikas Kandoi), No. 3 (Shri Raj Kr. Jaisansaria), and No. 4 (Shri Pawan Sharma). A penalty of Rs. 10,000/- was imposed on co-applicant No. 1, with immunity granted in excess of this amount. Immunity from prosecution under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Customs Act, 1962, was also granted to all co-applicants.

                            Decision of the Bench:
                            The Bench settled the case with the following terms:
                            - Imposition of a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on M/s. Royal Touch Fablon Pvt. Ltd. (Unit-I) and waiver of excess penalties.
                            - Full immunity from penalties to Shri Vikas Kandoi, Shri Raj Kr. Jaisansaria, and Shri Pawan Sharma.
                            - Immunity from prosecution to all co-applicants under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Customs Act, 1962, subject to payment of the ordered amount by co-applicant No. 1 within 30 days.
                            - The immunities are granted under Section 32K of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and are liable to be withdrawn if any material particulars are found to have been withheld or false evidence is provided.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found