Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (3) TMI 270 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Time limit for notice under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations is mandatory. License suspension invalid if not issued within 90 days. Appeal allowed, license reinstated. The Tribunal held that the time limit for issuing a notice under regulation 17(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 is mandatory. As the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Time limit for notice under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations is mandatory. License suspension invalid if not issued within 90 days. Appeal allowed, license reinstated.

                          The Tribunal held that the time limit for issuing a notice under regulation 17(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 is mandatory. As the notice was not issued within 90 days, the suspension of the Customs Broker License was deemed invalid, and the license automatically revived. The appeal was allowed, the suspension orders were set aside, and the appellant's Customs Broker License was reinstated.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of the continuation of the suspension of the Customs Broker License under regulation 16(2) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018.
                          2. Whether the issuance of a notice under regulation 17(1) within 90 days from the date of receipt of the offence report is mandatory or directory.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of the Continuation of the Suspension of the Customs Broker License:
                          The appellant's Customs Broker License was initially suspended on 15 October 2019 under regulation 16(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018, and the suspension was continued by an order dated 05 November 2019 under regulation 16(2). The appellant challenged the continuation of the suspension, arguing that the license should automatically revive as the mandatory notice under regulation 17(1) was not issued within 90 days from the date of receipt of the offence report.

                          2. Mandatory or Directory Nature of Regulation 17(1):
                          The core issue was whether the requirement to issue a notice within 90 days from the date of receipt of the offence report under regulation 17(1) was mandatory or directory. The appellant contended that non-compliance with this provision would result in the automatic revival of the license, citing judgments from the Delhi High Court and the Madras High Court. Conversely, the Department argued that the provision was directory, relying on judgments from the Bombay High Court and the Calcutta High Court.

                          Legal Provisions and Interpretation:
                          Regulation 16 allows for the suspension of a Customs Broker License if immediate action is necessary, while regulation 17 outlines the procedure for revoking a license or imposing a penalty, including the issuance of a notice within 90 days of receiving the offence report. The Tribunal examined various High Court decisions to determine the nature of this time limit.

                          Judgments from Different High Courts:
                          - Delhi High Court: Held that the time limit for issuing a notice under regulation 22(1) of the 2004 Regulations (similar to regulation 17(1) of the 2018 Regulations) is mandatory. Non-compliance would invalidate subsequent proceedings and revive the license.
                          - Madras High Court: Supported the view of the Delhi High Court, emphasizing the mandatory nature of the time limit to ensure swift action and accountability.
                          - Bombay High Court: Contrarily, held that the time limit is directory, suggesting that delays could be justified by recording reasons.
                          - Calcutta High Court: Followed the Bombay High Court's view, interpreting the time limit as directory due to the absence of specified consequences for non-compliance in the regulations.

                          Tribunal's Decision:
                          The Tribunal, guided by the Larger Bench decision in Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs. Kashmir Conductors, determined that in the face of conflicting High Court decisions, the view of the jurisdictional High Court (Delhi High Court) should be followed. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the time limit for issuing a notice under regulation 17(1) is mandatory. Since the notice was not issued within 90 days from 27 September 2019, the suspension order dated 15 October 2019, and its continuation by the order dated 05 November 2019, could not survive. Thus, the appellant's Customs Broker License automatically stood revived.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was allowed, and the suspension orders were set aside. The appellant's Customs Broker License was ordered to be revived automatically due to the non-issuance of the mandatory notice within the stipulated 90-day period.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found