Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's claim for refund of IGST was to be processed by the competent customs authority in accordance with the office interface procedure and whether the claim should be decided expeditiously after affording a hearing.
Analysis: On the basis of the communications placed before the Court, the authorities stated that the later amendments made in the GST returns containing IGST amounts could be processed through the officer interface already available in ICES. The Court therefore directed the competent authority among respondents 2 to 5 to act on the refund claim in the light of the relevant office letter and to follow the stated procedure. The Court further required that the petitioner be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard and that the consequential steps be completed within four weeks from production of a certified copy of the judgment.
Conclusion: The refund claim was directed to be processed and completed by the competent authority within the time fixed by the Court, in favour of the petitioner.