Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petitioner was entitled to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 to restrain the GST intelligence authorities from proceeding with summons and enquiry under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and from taking coercive steps before completion of the enquiry.
Analysis: The writ petition was founded on repeated summonses issued in connection with an enquiry concerning availment of input tax credit without receipt of goods. The petitioner had not appeared in response to the summonses and the record did not show any meaningful cooperation with the enquiry. Relief under Article 226 was held to be discretionary and available only where the petitioner's bona fides are not in doubt. The Court distinguished the earlier coordinate bench order relied upon, noting that it was rendered on different facts and expressly expected cooperation with the enquiry. Reliance was also placed on the principle that enquiry under such fiscal statutes should not be frustrated by non-cooperative conduct.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to writ relief to obstruct the enquiry or shield himself from the summons process, and the challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Discretionary writ relief under Article 226 will not be granted to impede a statutory enquiry under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 where the petitioner has not cooperated and his bona fides are suspect.