Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether contributions received from Government, public authorities, or local authorities are to be deducted in determining the actual cost of machinery for the purpose of development rebate under section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The Explanation to section 10(5) begins with the words "for the purposes of this sub-section" and is confined to the definitions used within that sub-section. It cannot be extended to govern development rebate under section 10(2)(vib). In the absence of any express provision in section 10(2)(vib) requiring deduction of contributions met by Government or public or local authorities, the expression "actual cost of the machinery or plant to the assessee" is to be understood as the amount paid for the asset, irrespective of the source from which the cost was met. The contrary reliance on section 43 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was rejected because that provision operated in a different statutory setting.
Conclusion: The contributions received from Government, public authorities, or local authorities are not deductible in computing the actual cost for development rebate under section 10(2)(vib); the question was answered in favour of the assessee.