Exemption on non-availment of Modvat credit depends on inputs used in the final product, not merely an intermediate product.

Exemption under Notification No. 4/97-CE and Notification No. 5/98-CE turned on whether Modvat credit was taken on inputs used in the exempted final product. Credit availed on inputs used only for an intermediate product, such as Lay Flat Tubing, did not by itself defeat the exemption; the decisive question was whether credit had also been taken on inputs used in the manufacture of Printed Plastic Packing Bags. Because the record did not conclusively verify non-availment of credit on all such final-product inputs, the matter was remanded for limited factual reconsideration and fresh decision on eligibility and duty demand.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 4/97-CE and Notification No. 5/98-CE despite availing Modvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of an intermediate product, and whether the demand could be sustained without verification of credit availed on inputs used in the manufacture of Printed Plastic Packing Bags.

Analysis: The only substantive question was whether credit had been taken on the inputs used in the manufacture of the final product. The record showed that Modvat credit was admittedly availed on inputs used for Lay Flat Tubing, which was an intermediate product, while the position regarding credit on other inputs used in the manufacture of Printed Plastic Packing Bags was not established on the existing material. If no credit had been taken on the inputs used for the final bags, the exemption notifications would remain available. Since the non-availment of credit on all inputs used in the final product was not conclusively verified, the matter required limited factual reconsideration.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision after verifying the limited factual issue relating to availment of credit on inputs used in the manufacture of Printed Plastic Packing Bags.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained a remand on the core eligibility issue, and the duty demand was left open for reconsideration after factual verification.

Ratio Decidendi: Where exemption depends on non-availment of credit on inputs used in the final product, availing credit only on inputs used for an intermediate product does not by itself defeat the exemption; the decisive fact is whether credit was taken on the inputs of the exempted final product.

---