Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the surplus arising from the single transaction of purchase and adjustment of the compensation claim constituted profit from an adventure in the nature of trade, or a casual and non-recurring receipt not exigible to tax.
Analysis: The assessee had earlier been connected with a business of purchase and sale of evacuee compensation claims, but that business had closed several years before the relevant year. The transaction in question was a solitary purchase, was not repeated in the accounting year or thereafter, and was ultimately utilised for acquiring a house. Although a single transaction can in appropriate circumstances amount to an adventure in the nature of trade, the surrounding facts did not disclose any trading character or profit-making scheme. The determination depended on the factual setting and the Tribunal's finding on those facts was supported by the record.
Conclusion: The receipt was not income from an adventure in the nature of trade and was not taxable as business profit; the question was answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded, and the taxability of the amount as trading profit was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A solitary transaction does not become an adventure in the nature of trade unless the facts disclose a trading motive or commercial character; where the transaction is isolated and lacks such indicia, the resulting surplus is not taxable as business profit.