Legally enforceable debt requirement under cheque dishonour law led to quashing of the prosecution at the threshold.

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies only where the cheque is issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability. On the facts noted, no executed deed or enforceable sale agreement was shown, and the cheque was not linked to any existing consideration or liability. Because the foundational ingredients of the offence were absent, the statutory presumption could not sustain the prosecution at the threshold, and the criminal proceeding was quashed as unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the cognizance and proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be sustained when the cheque was not shown to have been issued towards a legally enforceable debt or other liability.

Analysis: Section 138 is attracted only when the cheque is drawn for discharge, in whole or in part, of a debt or other liability. On the facts alleged, no deed or enforceable sale agreement had been executed, and the cheque was not shown to have been issued towards any existing consideration or liability. In the absence of the foundational ingredients of the offence, the statutory presumption could not sustain the prosecution at the threshold.

Conclusion: The proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was held unsustainable and was quashed in favour of the petitioner.

Final Conclusion: The criminal proceeding was terminated at the threshold for want of the essential ingredients of the cheque dishonour offence.

Ratio Decidendi: A prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot survive unless the cheque is shown to have been issued towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability.

---