Writ jurisdiction and factual classification under entry tax law give way to the statutory appellate remedy.

A writ challenge to an entry tax assessment on unmanufactured tobacco raised a classification dispute under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979, including whether the goods remained agricultural produce and whether they fell within the notified raw materials and inputs for tobacco manufacture. Because resolving that question required factual examination better suited to the statutory appellate authority, the writ remedy was treated as inappropriate where an effective appeal was available. The Commissioner's circular was regarded as irrelevant to the core tax liability dispute, and the matter was left to be pursued in appeal on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the assessment and demand could be entertained when the dispute turned on classification of unmanufactured tobacco and the petitioner had an efficacious statutory appellate remedy under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979.

Analysis: The dispute concerned levy of entry tax on unmanufactured tobacco under Section 3 of the Act and the applicability of the notification dated 30.03.2002, with the petitioner asserting that the goods were agricultural produce under Section 2(A)(1). The question whether the goods had undergone processes taking them out of the definition of agricultural produce, and whether they fell within the notified raw materials and inputs used in manufacture of tobacco products, involved factual examination suited to the statutory appellate authority. The challenge to the Commissioner's circular was held to be irrelevant to the real controversy, as the circular did not itself adjudicate the petitioner's tax liability.

Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained and the petitioner was directed to avail the statutory appellate remedy.

Final Conclusion: The assessment dispute was left for determination by the appellate authority on merits, and interim protection was granted only to enable filing of the statutory appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the controversy is primarily one of factual classification under a taxing statute and an effective statutory appeal is available, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked to bypass the prescribed appellate mechanism.

---