Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether malted barley or barley malt, maize flakes and hops pellets are agricultural or horticultural produce falling within entry 2 of Schedule II of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 and therefore exempt from entry tax, or whether they are goods liable to tax under entry 80 of Schedule I.
Analysis: Section 3 of the Act levies entry tax on goods specified in Schedule I, while section 3(6) exempts goods specified in Schedule II. The definition of "agricultural or horticultural produce" in section 2(A)(1) excludes produce subjected to any physical, chemical or other process for being made fit for consumption, except mere cleaning, grading, sorting or drying. The exemption entry cannot be enlarged by implication where the statute has expressly carved out only limited inclusions. The controlling test is not whether the processed commodity retains its original identity, but whether the produce has been processed to make it fit for consumption when it enters the local area, including consumption as a raw material in manufacture. Applying that test, barley converted into malted barley, maize into flakes or grits, and hops into pellets are processed commodities made fit for consumption in beer manufacture and are outside the definition of agricultural produce.
Conclusion: The products in question are not agricultural or horticultural produce within entry 2 of Schedule II and are liable to entry tax.
Ratio Decidendi: A produce subjected to physical, chemical or other processing for being made fit for consumption loses the character of agricultural produce under the Act, and such goods cannot claim exemption merely because they originate from an agricultural commodity.