Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 12(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was leviable when the turnover in question was reflected in the books of account and there was no specific concealment.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the disputed turnover was already available in the assessee's books of account and that the assessment arose from the materials disclosed in those books. On that footing, it applied the principle that the penal provision under Section 12(3)(b) is attracted only where the addition is referable to estimated turnover based on specific concealment, and not where the turnover is part of the recorded accounts. The High Court agreed that these were findings of fact and that they did not give rise to any question of law.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 12(3)(b) was not leviable on the facts found, and the revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under Section 12(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 is not attracted where the disputed turnover is already disclosed in the books of account and no specific concealment is found.