Time-barred claim rejected in insolvency case due to exceeding limitation period

The Adjudicating Authority concluded that the applicant's claim for unpaid dues against the Corporate Debtor was time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act. As the petition was filed well beyond the three-year limitation period from the default date, it was deemed barred by limitation. Consequently, the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was rejected. The proceedings against the Corporate Debtor, Sahara Prime City Ltd., in petition CP No.(IB)168/ALD/2019 were dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Determining whether the claim of the applicant/petitioner is within limitation or barred by limitation under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Claim of the Applicant
The applicant, an Operational Creditor, filed a petition for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor, Sahara Prime City Ltd., for unpaid dues from September 2014 to May 2015. The total claimed amount is Rs. 12,49,250.

Issue 2: Limitation Analysis
The Adjudicating Authority considered the limitation aspect based on Article 137 of the Limitation Act. The right to sue accrues when a default occurs, and the application must be filed within three years from that date. In this case, the default date was 30.09.2015, but the petition was filed on 15.05.2019, well beyond the three-year limitation period.

Issue 3: Legal Precedents
The Authority referred to legal precedents, including the Supreme Court judgments in Mithailal Dalsangar Singh v. Annabai Devram Kini and Ram Nath Sao v. Gobardhan Sao. It also cited the relevance of Article 137 of the Limitation Act as per the decisions in B.K. Educational Services (P.) Ltd. v. Paras Gupta & Associates and Gaurav Hargovindbhai Dave v. Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.

Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, the Adjudicating Authority concluded that the applicant's claim was time-barred under Article 137 of the Limitation Act. As a result, the petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was deemed barred by limitation and rejected. The petition CP No.(IB)168/ALD/2019 was dismissed, and proceedings against the Corporate Debtor, Sahara Prime City Ltd., were not initiated.

---