Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Section 9 insolvency application was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and therefore not liable to be admitted.
Analysis: The claim arose from unpaid salary allegedly due for the period from September 2014 to May 2015, and the stated date of default was 30.09.2015. The application was filed on 15.05.2019, which was beyond three years from the date when the right to apply accrued. Article 137 applies to applications under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code from the inception of the Code, and a petition filed beyond three years from default is barred unless delay is condoned on legally recognised grounds.
Conclusion: The application was barred by limitation and was not admissible. The finding is against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and if filed more than three years after default, it is time-barred unless delay is validly condoned.