Tribunal approves Taguda's resolution plan over liquidation application, emphasizing alignment with IBC objectives.

The Tribunal rejected the application for liquidation (MA 626 of 2019) and approved the resolution plan submitted by Taguda Pte. Ltd. (MA 762/2019). The RP was directed to hand over all records and premises to the Resolution Applicant for plan implementation. The decision emphasized the Tribunal's supervisory role to ensure CoC decisions align with IBC objectives and sound commercial judgment, with Taguda's plan deemed more beneficial for stakeholders.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Application for Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.
2. Objections to the decision of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) for liquidation.
3. Resolution Plan submitted by Taguda Pte. Ltd.
4. Claims by various stakeholders including financial creditors, operational creditors, and employees.
5. Legal and procedural compliance under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Application for Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor:
- Application No. 626 of 2019: Filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 33 of IBC, seeking an order for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor and appointment of Mr. Sudip Bhattacharya as the Liquidator.
- Background: The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for the Corporate Debtor began on 14.05.2018, initiated by a financial creditor, SBI. The 270-day period for CIRP concluded on 07.02.2019.
- CoC Decision: The CoC, with 77.61% voting share, rejected the sole resolution plan submitted by Taguda Pte. Ltd., leading to the RP filing for liquidation.

2. Objections to the CoC's Decision for Liquidation:
- Miscellaneous Application No. 716 of 2019: Filed by Lodha Development Management Pvt. Ltd., a financial creditor with 1.03% voting share in CoC, arguing that the CoC's decision for liquidation was not based on credible information and that Taguda's resolution plan offered a better revival option.
- Key Arguments: Lodha emphasized that Taguda's plan included an upfront payment of INR 200 Crores and a structured recovery mechanism for receivables, which was more beneficial compared to the liquidation value of INR 67 Crores.
- Concerns Raised: Lodha questioned the credibility of SBI's assessment of recoverable receivables and highlighted the potential adverse impact on employees and the overall objective of the IBC.

3. Resolution Plan Submitted by Taguda Pte. Ltd.:
- Miscellaneous Application No. 762/2019: Filed by Taguda Pte. Ltd., seeking approval of its resolution plan, which proposed an upfront payment of INR 200 Crores and additional payments based on receivables recovery.
- Plan Details: The plan included provisions for CIRP costs, operational creditors, and capital infusion for the Corporate Debtor's revival. Taguda argued that the CoC's decision was based on unsubstantiated claims of receivables worth INR 400-500 Crores.
- RP's Position: The RP stated that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to sit in appeal over the CoC's decision unless it is shown to be perverse or against the provisions of the Code.

4. Claims by Various Stakeholders:
- Miscellaneous Application No. 857 of 2019: Filed by the Employees Association, challenging the CoC's decision and supporting Taguda's plan, emphasizing the lower liquidation value and adverse impact on employees.
- Miscellaneous Application No. 517 of 2019: Filed by Canara Bank, seeking preferential treatment in the resolution plan, arguing that its secured claims were not adequately addressed.
- Miscellaneous Application No. 989 of 2019: Filed by a promoter, challenging the CoC's decision and alleging procedural lapses in the CIRP, including non-disclosure of resolution plans to the promoters.

5. Legal and Procedural Compliance:
- Judicial Precedents: The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank, emphasizing the non-justiciability of CoC's commercial decisions unless they contravene the provisions of the IBC.
- Tribunal's Findings: The Tribunal found that the CoC's decision lacked prudence and commercial wisdom, as it was based on unsubstantiated claims of receivables. The Tribunal emphasized the objective of the IBC to promote resolution over liquidation and found Taguda's plan to be more beneficial for the stakeholders.

Conclusion:
- The Tribunal rejected the application for liquidation (MA 626 of 2019) and approved the resolution plan submitted by Taguda Pte. Ltd. (MA 762/2019).
- The Tribunal directed the RP to hand over all records and premises to the Resolution Applicant for implementation of the plan.
- The decision was based on the Tribunal's supervisory jurisdiction to ensure that the CoC's decisions align with the objectives of the IBC and are based on sound commercial judgment.

---