Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether writ petitions challenging revision notices issued under Section 27 of the TNVAT Act were maintainable at the stage of notice, and whether the assessee was entitled to invoke the exemption under Section 15 of the TNVAT Act to resist proposed levy of purchase tax under Section 12(1)(C) of the TNVAT Act.
Analysis: The challenge was directed against revision notices proposing reopening of assessment and levy of purchase tax. Such reopening is ordinarily not interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless it is shown to be wholly time-barred or vitiated by a clear case of change of opinion. The questions raised by the dealers, including the applicability of the exemption and the correct classification of goods, were matters for the Assessing Officer to examine in the first instance. The proper course was to submit objections to the notices, whereupon the Assessing Officer was bound to decide the matter independently on the basis of the dealers' reply and supporting material, without being controlled by third-party circulars or enforcement directions.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were premature and not maintainable against the revision notices, and the challenge failed.