Independent broker and routine inspection services do not create withholding tax liability on coal import payments or fees for technical services.

Payments for coal imports made to non-resident suppliers were not subject to withholding under section 195 because the Indian broker acted only as an independent intermediary, without authority to conclude contracts or exclusive control by the non-residents; no business connection or permanent establishment in India was established, so the assessee was not liable as an assessee in default under section 201. Inspection charges paid to a non-resident agency were also not fees for technical services, because the service was limited to inspection and certification and did not involve technical advice or skill; tax deduction was therefore not required and the TDS demand failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether tax was deductible under section 195 on payments made for import of coal to non-resident suppliers on the footing that they had a business connection/permanent establishment in India through the broker. (ii) Whether inspection charges paid to a non-resident inspection agency were fees for technical services liable to tax deduction at source.

Issue (i): Whether tax was deductible under section 195 on payments made for import of coal to non-resident suppliers on the footing that they had a business connection/permanent establishment in India through the broker.

Analysis: The payments for coal import were examined in the light of section 195, section 5(1), section 9(1)(i) and Explanation 2 thereto. The decisive question was whether the Indian broker acted as an agent having authority to conclude contracts or was merely an independent intermediary acting in the ordinary course of business. The evidence showed that the broker merely facilitated communication, forwarded offers and counter-offers, charged brokerage from multiple clients, had no stock of goods, had no authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the non-residents, and was not shown to be under their control. The contracts were on a principal-to-principal basis, the non-residents delivered directly, and the commission paid to the broker represented arm's length remuneration. In these circumstances, the statutory exception for an independent agent applied and no business connection or permanent establishment of the non-residents in India was established.

Conclusion: Tax was not deductible under section 195 on the coal import payments, and the assessee was not liable as an assessee in default under section 201.

Issue (ii): Whether inspection charges paid to a non-resident inspection agency were fees for technical services liable to tax deduction at source.

Analysis: The inspection agency only carried out inspection and issued an inspection certificate in connection with shipment of coal at the port of origin. The service was confined to verification and reporting and did not involve the rendering of technical knowledge, skill, or advice to the assessee. There was also no finding that the inspection agency had a business connection or permanent establishment in India. The payment was therefore not in the nature of fees for technical services.

Conclusion: No tax was deductible on the inspection charges, and the demand raised on that account was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The assessee was held not liable for the TDS demands raised on either the coal import payments or the inspection charges, and the additions made under section 201 were deleted.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an intermediary merely facilitates transactions as an independent broker in the ordinary course of business without authority to conclude contracts or act exclusively for the non-resident, no business connection or permanent establishment arises in India, and routine inspection services unaccompanied by technical advice do not constitute fees for technical services.

---