TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether properties standing in the name of the deceased's wife, held benami for the deceased, were includible in the principal value of the estate of the deceased under the Estate Duty Act; (ii) Whether the addition made on account of goodwill of the rice-mill business was sustainable.
Issue (i): Whether properties standing in the name of the deceased's wife, held benami for the deceased, were includible in the principal value of the estate of the deceased under the Estate Duty Act.
Analysis: Once the finding of benami was accepted, the accountable person held the properties for the benefit of the deceased as real owner. Under the principles reflected in section 82 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, the benamidar holds for the person who provided the consideration unless a different intention is shown. The distinction between real owner and ostensible owner, read with section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, showed that the benamidar had only nominal title, while beneficial ownership vested in the real owner. On that basis, the properties belonged to the deceased at the time of death and were chargeable to estate duty.
Conclusion: The properties were rightly includible in the estate of the deceased under section 5 of the Estate Duty Act, and the answer was in favour of the revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the addition made on account of goodwill of the rice-mill business was sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal had found that the rice-mill had no goodwill at all, and the reference did not permit reconsideration of the existence of goodwill as a separate question. In the absence of a sustainable basis for the addition, the amount added towards goodwill could not stand.
Conclusion: The deletion of the goodwill addition was justified, and the answer was against the revenue.
Final Conclusion: The benami assets were taxable in the hands of the deceased as part of his estate, but the goodwill addition did not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: In a true benami transaction, beneficial ownership remains with the real owner, and property so held is includible in that owner's estate for estate duty purposes; a goodwill addition cannot stand where the finding of no goodwill is unchallenged or outside the scope of reference.
TaxTMI 
