TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the value of the paddy lands was includible in the estate of the deceased, either as the value of the land or as the right to recover the purchase money. (ii) Whether the Gaddemane Estate standing in the name of the daughter was includible in the principal value of the estate as property passing on death under section 5 of the Estate Duty Act.
Issue (i): Whether the value of the paddy lands was includible in the estate of the deceased, either as the value of the land or as the right to recover the purchase money.
Analysis: The title to one parcel of land was under a cloud because the authority had rejected the vendor's title in respect of survey No. 596, though the matter was pending in appeal. Where title is uncertain, the estate duty computation must reflect either the full value if title is ultimately upheld, or, failing that, the value of the deceased's enforceable right to recover the purchase money attributable to the defective title. The land in survey No. 595 stood on a different footing because the vendor's title to that extent had been upheld, so its proportionate value was properly includible.
Conclusion: The proportionate value of 5 acres in survey No. 595 was includible in the estate. Survey No. 596 could be included if title was finally upheld, and otherwise only the notional value of the right to recover the purchase money attributable to that land could be brought into the estate.
Issue (ii): Whether the Gaddemane Estate standing in the name of the daughter was includible in the principal value of the estate as property passing on death under section 5 of the Estate Duty Act.
Analysis: The will treated the property as the deceased's self-acquisition, and the accountable persons had conceded that the daughter was only a benamidar. In a benami arrangement, the benamidar has no real title and disappears from the ownership chain, while beneficial ownership remains with the real owner. The deceased was therefore the true owner, and the beneficial interest passed on his death.
Conclusion: The Gaddemane Estate was includible in the principal value of the estate and was chargeable under section 5(1) of the Estate Duty Act.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered substantially against the accountable persons, with the estate duty inclusion upheld for the property treated as belonging to the deceased and for the paddy lands to the extent indicated.
Ratio Decidendi: Where title to purchased property is defective or under challenge, estate duty may attach to the deceased's enforceable right to recover the purchase money; and property held benami is assessable in the estate of the real owner because beneficial ownership, not the name on the title deed, determines passing on death.
TaxTMI 
