Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 64 of the U.P. GST Act, 2018 and the dismissal of the first appeal as time-barred warranted interference in writ jurisdiction.
Analysis: The petition was stated to involve facts identical to another writ petition decided by a separate order on the same date, and the present matter was disposed of on the same reasoning, without separate substantive adjudication in the order itself.
Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed on the same terms and conditions as the connected matter, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned assessment and consequential appellate rejection did not survive, and the petitioner obtained writ relief on the footing adopted in the connected case.