Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation, with delay beyond the further condonable period, could be entertained by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The prescribed period for filing the first appeal was three months, with only thirty days thereafter available for condonation of delay. The appeal was filed beyond the outer limit by about nine days. In view of the settled position that the appellate authority has no power to condone delay beyond the statutorily fixed limit, the delay condonation application was not maintainable and could not be entertained.
Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal as time barred was upheld and no error was found in the appellate authority's refusal to condone the delay.