Tribunal allows appeal due to filing delay, deletes capital gains additions, emphasizes income determination from capital account.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing due to the serious illness and demise of the husband. The additions of long term and short term capital gains were deleted as the assessee acted as a GPA holder for the land, and there was no transfer of property in her favor. The Tribunal emphasized that the entries in the capital account were not determinative of income, leading to the deletion of both additions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. Addition of long term capital gains on the transfer of land.
3. Addition of short term capital gains on the transfer of building.

Condonation of Delay:
The appeal was time-barred by 50 days, with the assessee attributing the delay to the serious illness and subsequent demise of her husband. The Tribunal, after considering the medical certificates and explanations provided, held that the delay was due to a sufficient cause and thus condoned the normal delay in filing the appeal.

Addition of Long Term Capital Gains:
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 9,90,000 on account of long term capital gains arising from the transfer of land, based on the stamp duty value of Rs. 10 lakhs as per the registered deed. The assessee contended that she was not the owner of the land but merely a holder of a registered General Power of Attorney (GPA) from the original owner. The CIT(A) rejected the contention, noting that the Ikrar Nama provided by the assessee was not a registered document and that the property was shown in her capital account. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee acted as a GPA holder for the original owner, and as no consideration passed between her and the buyer, there was no transfer of property in her favor. Consequently, the additions on long term capital gains were deleted.

Addition of Short Term Capital Gains:
The AO added Rs. 10 lakhs as short term capital gains due to the transfer of the building on the land, which was not mentioned in the registered sale deed. The Tribunal found that as the property was not transferred to the assessee, there was no justification for taxing her on short term capital gains. The Tribunal emphasized that the entries in the capital account were not determinative of income, and after examining the documents and circumstances, concluded that no transfer of capital asset had occurred. Therefore, the addition on short term capital gains was also deleted.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities and deleting both the additions of long term and short term capital gains.

---