Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under section 34(2) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice and for being a non-speaking order.
Analysis: The impugned order merely recorded the dealer's presence and the filing of documents, but it did not disclose any consideration of the petitioner's submissions or the reasons for the demand raised. A quasi-judicial authority is required to record reasons in support of its conclusions, since reasons are integral to fairness, transparency, and effective judicial review. The absence of notice of further hearing and the absence of any reasoned determination showed a clear violation of the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment order could not be sustained and was liable to be quashed and set aside.