Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on services used for ventilation stopping area and isolation stopping area within the mines was inadmissible as relating to construction of a civil structure or part thereof under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The disputed credit related to structures maintained within the mining area for ventilation and isolation, which were stated to be mandatory for mine operations. The expression "civil structure" in the exclusion clause was applied narrowly, and the same reasoning earlier adopted for support structures in mines was followed. On that basis, the impugned structures were treated as not answering to the character of a civil structure or part thereof.
Conclusion: The denial of CENVAT credit on the disputed amount was not sustainable and the credit was admissible.
Ratio Decidendi: Structures within a mine that are integral to operational requirements and do not bear the character of a civil structure fall outside the exclusion in Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.