Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation, and whether any acknowledgment of debt extended the limitation period.
Analysis: The Limitation Act, 1963 applies to proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code from the inception of the Code. Consequently, Article 137 governs applications under section 7, and the three-year limitation period begins from the date of default. The record showed default in 2009, while the application was filed in July 2018. The earlier demand notice and pending DRT/SARFAESI proceedings did not extend limitation. The material on record did not disclose any acknowledgment of debt within three years preceding the filing date so as to attract section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 or extend the period of limitation.
Conclusion: The application was held to be barred by limitation and was not admitted.
Ratio Decidendi: Applications under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are subject to the Limitation Act, 1963 from the inception of the Code, and unless a valid acknowledgment or other legally recognised extension is shown within the limitation period, a claim arising from a default beyond three years is time-barred.