Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1976 (7) TMI 18 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Valid trust deed and charitable business exemption upheld for maternity-home income, with management salary allowed as deduction. A registered trust deed that, read as a whole, clearly identified the trust property, beneficiaries and objects was treated as sufficient to transfer the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Valid trust deed and charitable business exemption upheld for maternity-home income, with management salary allowed as deduction.

                          A registered trust deed that, read as a whole, clearly identified the trust property, beneficiaries and objects was treated as sufficient to transfer the maternity homes and Versova property to the trustees and create a valid trust. The business of running the maternity homes, being itself settled upon trust for charitable purposes, was held to fall within the substantive exemption for trust property, so its income was exempt from tax. Salary paid to Dr. Mrs. Divekar for managing the hospitals was treated as ordinary business expenditure and deductible in computing the trustees' income.




                          Issues: (i) whether the trust deed validly transferred the maternity homes and the Versova property to the trustees so as to create a valid trust; (ii) whether the income from running the maternity homes, being business settled upon trust, was exempt under section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; and (iii) whether the salary paid to Dr. Mrs. Divekar was allowable as a deduction in computing the income of the trustees as an association of persons.

                          Issue (i): whether the trust deed validly transferred the maternity homes and the Versova property to the trustees so as to create a valid trust.

                          Analysis: The trust deed was a registered non-testamentary instrument signed by the settlors, who were also trustees. Reading the deed as a whole, the intention to create a trust, the trust property, the beneficiaries, and the objects were clearly identified. The absence of express words of present transfer was not decisive, because the operative recitals and the declaration that the trustees would hold the properties showed that the transfer was effected by the deed itself. The Court applied a substance-over-form approach and held that the requirements of sections 5 and 6 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 were substantially satisfied.

                          Conclusion: The transfer was valid and the trust was duly created, in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): whether the income from running the maternity homes, being business settled upon trust, was exempt under section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

                          Analysis: The deed showed that not only the immovable property but also the business of running the two maternity homes was settled upon trust. Where business itself is held under trust for charitable purposes, it falls within the substantive part of section 4(3)(i), and the limitations in proviso (b) apply only to business carried on on behalf of a charitable institution, not to business itself held in trust. On that construction, the income derived from the maternity-hospital business was within the statutory exemption.

                          Conclusion: The income was exempt from tax, in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iii): whether the salary paid to Dr. Mrs. Divekar was allowable as a deduction in computing the income of the trustees as an association of persons.

                          Analysis: The deed expressly provided for payment to Dr. Mrs. Divekar for managing the hospitals. That payment formed part of the normal expenditure incurred in carrying on and managing the business of the maternity homes and had to be deducted before determining the income assessable in the hands of the trustees.

                          Conclusion: The salary was an admissible deduction, in favour of the assessee.

                          Final Conclusion: The reference was answered wholly in favour of the assessee, with the trust recognized as valid, the maternity-hospital business held exempt as trust property, and the management salary treated as deductible expenditure.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A registered trust deed that, read as a whole, clearly manifests an intention to create a trust and identifies the trust property, objects, and beneficiaries is effective to transfer property and create a valid trust; and where a business itself is held under trust for charitable purposes, its income falls within the substantive exemption and is not controlled by the proviso governing business carried on on behalf of a charitable institution.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found