TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Directs Proper Notice Service in GST Dispute</h1> The Gujarat High Court, with judges Ms. Harsha Devani and Ms. Sangeeta K. Vishen, JJ., addressed a dispute over the issuance and service of a notice in ... Service of notice - Form GST MOV 10 - section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017 - HELD THAT:- Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya, learned Assistant Government Pleader to ensure that a copy of the notice issued in Form GST MOV 10 shall be duly furnished to the learned advocate for the petitioner forthwith, today - the petitioner is required to remain present before the respondent authority on 25.09.2019. Stand over to 26th September 2019. Issues:1. Dispute regarding the issuance and service of notice in Form GST MOV 10 under section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.Analysis:The judgment delivered by the Gujarat High Court, with judges Ms. Harsha Devani and Ms. Sangeeta K. Vishen, JJ., revolves around a dispute concerning the issuance and service of a notice in Form GST MOV 10 under section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya, informed the court that the notice had been issued and served upon the petitioner. However, the petitioner's advocate, Mr. Manan Paneri, disputed this claim and mentioned that while the petitioner had signed various documents, he had not received a copy of the MOV 10 notice.In response to the conflicting statements, the court directed Mr. Trupesh Kathiriya to ensure that a copy of the notice issued in Form GST MOV 10 is promptly provided to the petitioner's advocate on the same day. The notice required the petitioner's presence before the respondent authority on a specified date. The court instructed the petitioner to appear before the concerned authority on the given date and present his submissions. The case was adjourned to 26th September 2019 for further proceedings.This judgment underscores the importance of ensuring proper service of legal notices and upholding the rights of the parties involved in legal proceedings. The court's intervention in facilitating the provision of the notice to the petitioner's advocate highlights the adherence to due process and fairness in legal matters. The directive for the petitioner to appear before the concerned authority emphasizes the significance of active participation and compliance with legal requirements in resolving disputes under the GST Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
