TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Allows Withdrawal of Company Petition under IBC Section 12A</h1> <h3>M/s. Gowra Petrochem Private Limited Versus M/s. Ashok Polymers Limited And V.S. Sridhar, Resolution Professional</h3> M/s. Gowra Petrochem Private Limited Versus M/s. Ashok Polymers Limited And V.S. Sridhar, Resolution Professional - TMI Issues:1. Application for withdrawal of company petition under section 12A of IBC.2. Approval of withdrawal application by Committee of Creditors.3. Interpretation of regulations regarding withdrawal of application.4. Legal implications of allowing withdrawal post-publication of Expression of Interest (EOI).Issue 1: Application for withdrawal of company petition under section 12A of IBCThe Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the company petition CP(IB) NO. 315/7/HDB/2018 under section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), along with Regulation 30A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Regulations, 2016. The IRP was appointed for the Corporate Debtor and constituted a committee of creditors in accordance with Section 21 of the IBC. The withdrawal application was filed by the Financial Creditor, Gowra Petrochem Private Limited, with no conditions attached except for the deviation of a Bank Guarantee towards estimated costs incurred for specific purposes.Issue 2: Approval of withdrawal application by Committee of CreditorsThe Committee of Creditors (COC) meetings were held, where the withdrawal application was discussed and approved. The COC unanimously (100%) approved the withdrawal application submitted by Gowra Petrochem Private Limited/Financial Creditor. The COC's approval was crucial as per the provisions of Section 12A of the IBC, requiring 90% voting share approval for withdrawal applications.Issue 3: Interpretation of regulations regarding withdrawal of applicationRegulation 30A of the I&B (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) Regulations, 2016, details the procedure for withdrawal of applications under section 12A of the IBC. The regulation mandates that the application for withdrawal must be submitted before the issuance of an invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) and accompanied by a bank guarantee towards estimated costs. The Resolution Professional (RP) is responsible for submitting the application to the Adjudicating Authority upon approval by the COC with 90% voting share.Issue 4: Legal implications of allowing withdrawal post-publication of EOIThe Tribunal considered the legal implications of allowing withdrawal after the publication of EOI. Referring to a previous decision, the Tribunal highlighted that Section 12A of the IBC prevails over regulations, allowing for withdrawal even after the issuance of an EOI. The Tribunal emphasized that the COC's unanimous approval for withdrawal, along with the absence of pending CIRP expenses, justified granting permission for withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC. Consequently, the Tribunal approved the application for withdrawal, leading to the closure of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for the concerned company petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
