Financial debt and limitation under insolvency law recognised for revival funding backed by liability acknowledgments

Money advanced under a memorandum of understanding for working capital support, statutory dues and business revival was treated as having the commercial effect of borrowing, so it qualified as financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Later electronic messages acknowledging the outstanding liability were accepted as valid acknowledgments that extended limitation, making the section 7 application timely. On these findings, the NCLT admitted the insolvency application, commenced CIRP, declared moratorium and appointed an interim resolution professional.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the unpaid amount advanced under the memorandum of understanding constituted a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. (ii) Whether the financial debt claim was barred by limitation.

Issue (i): Whether the unpaid amount advanced under the memorandum of understanding constituted a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: The arrangement under the memorandum of understanding required the applicant to provide working capital, meet statutory dues, and support the corporate debtor's operations with a view to reviving and taking over the business. The funds were infused pursuant to this commercial arrangement and were sought to be recovered after the definitive transaction did not materialise. On these facts, the amount raised bore the commercial effect of borrowing and was not a mere equity infusion or expense claim.

Conclusion: The claim fell within the definition of financial debt and the issue was decided in favour of the financial creditor.

Issue (ii): Whether the financial debt claim was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The record contained later communications, including electronic messages, in which the corporate debtor acknowledged the outstanding liability and assured payment. Such communications were treated as admissible evidence and as acknowledgments extending limitation. Counting from the last acknowledged transaction and the subsequent acknowledgments, the application was within time when filed.

Conclusion: The claim was within limitation and the issue was decided in favour of the financial creditor.

Final Conclusion: The application under section 7 was admitted, insolvency resolution commenced, moratorium was declared, and an interim resolution professional was appointed.

Ratio Decidendi: Money advanced under a revival and takeover arrangement can constitute financial debt where the transaction has the commercial effect of borrowing, and subsequent written or electronic acknowledgments of liability can extend limitation.

---