Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order made under Section 25 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was liable to be set aside for want of proper notice and non-service of the order.
Analysis: The assessment was challenged on the ground that notice was not effectively served and that recovery steps were initiated without communicating the assessment order. The materials placed before the Court showed that the covers sent to the petitioner were returned with the endorsement that the door was locked, and the Court accepted the petitioner's explanation that the original assessment order had not been served. On that basis, the assessment order was found to be contrary to Section 25 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act and violative of the principles of natural justice. The merits of the assessment were not examined.
Conclusion: The assessment order dated 25.09.2018 was set aside and the matter was restored to the file for fresh completion of assessment after notice.