Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (9) TMI 416 - AT - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appellate tribunal remands wealth tax case for land valuation review & assessment The appellate tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for further verification and assessment regarding the imposition of wealth tax on ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Appellate tribunal remands wealth tax case for land valuation review & assessment

                              The appellate tribunal remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for further verification and assessment regarding the imposition of wealth tax on non-urban land. The valuation of the land was revised based on the Departmental Valuation Officer's assessment rather than the circle rate, resulting in a significant reduction in the land's value for wealth tax purposes. The issue of charging interest under the Wealth Tax Act was not explicitly addressed in the judgment, with the focus primarily on the valuation and classification of the land. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes pending additional verification and clarification on the land's classification and valuation.




                              Issues:
                              1. Imposition of wealth tax on non-urban land.
                              2. Addition to net wealth based on circle rate.
                              3. Charging of interest under Wealth Tax Act.

                              Analysis:

                              Issue 1: Imposition of wealth tax on non-urban land
                              The appellant challenged the imposition of wealth tax on a non-urban land of 21.65 acres situated at a specific location. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined the value of the land based on the circle rate, leading to a significant addition to the net wealth of the assessee. The appellant argued that the land was uncultivable waste land, not suitable for agricultural, industrial, or residential purposes. The appellant contended that the land did not fall under the definition of taxable asset for wealth tax purposes. The appellant cited relevant statutory provisions and definitions to support their claim. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) considered the arguments and evidence presented by both parties. After thorough examination, it was decided that the matter required further clarification regarding the permissibility of construction on the land as per existing laws. The case was remanded back to the AO for necessary verification and assessment. The appellant was instructed to cooperate in obtaining relevant certificates and records for clarification. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

                              Issue 2: Addition to net wealth based on circle rate
                              The AO had added a substantial amount to the net wealth of the assessee based on the circle rate of the land. The appellant contested this addition, emphasizing that the land was not fit for sale or any productive use, thus challenging the valuation method adopted by the AO. The Commissioner analyzed the contentions of both parties and considered the valuation report submitted by the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO). After detailed scrutiny, it was determined that the value of the land should be revised based on the DVO's assessment rather than the circle rate applied by the AO. The value was adjusted significantly lower than the initial assessment, taking into account the nature and usability of the land. The appellant's objections were upheld, and the value of the land for wealth tax purposes was revised accordingly.

                              Issue 3: Charging of interest under Wealth Tax Act
                              The appellant raised concerns regarding the charging of interest under the Wealth Tax Act by the AO. The appellant argued that the imposition of interest was unjustified and contrary to the provisions of the Act. However, the specific details and reasoning behind the imposition of interest were not elaborated upon in the summary provided. The judgment did not explicitly address the issue of interest charges under the Wealth Tax Act, focusing primarily on the valuation and classification of the land for wealth tax purposes.

                              In conclusion, the appellate tribunal's judgment addressed the key issues raised by the appellant regarding the imposition of wealth tax on non-urban land, addition to net wealth based on circle rate, and the charging of interest under the Wealth Tax Act. The decision provided detailed analysis, legal interpretations, and directives for further assessment, ultimately allowing the appeal for statistical purposes based on the need for additional verification and clarification regarding the land's classification and valuation for wealth tax purposes.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found