Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exporters supplying goods through a Free Trade Warehousing Zone, while not being a unit in the FTWZ, are entitled to benefits under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme, and whether the earlier rejection orders and later clarification could be sustained.
Analysis: The exclusion in paragraph 3.06(vii) of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 applies to exports made by units in FTWZ. The impugned clarification treated supplies from DTA to FTWZ as ineligible by relying on paragraph 3.06(i) and on the nature of FTWZ under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, but did not address the distinct contention that the petitioner was not a FTWZ unit and had only exported goods through FTWZ. The earlier rejection orders were also set aside because the proper policy interpretation had not been examined by the competent authority.
Conclusion: The rejection orders and the clarification were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the petitioner's claim under the relevant FTP provisions.