Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ applicant had made out a strong prima facie case for interim protection against coercive action in proceedings initiated under section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The Court noticed that, on the materials placed before it, the writ applicant had disclosed a strong prima facie case warranting interim relief. Pending return of notice and further reply from the concerned authority, protection against coercive steps was considered necessary. The applicant was directed to appear before the authority and place his stand, and the authority was directed to file an appropriate reply regarding the alleged liability sought to be enforced through summons.
Conclusion: Interim protection against coercive action was granted in favour of the writ applicant, with the matter kept pending for further consideration.