Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subscription receipts earned by the assessee from Indian customers for access to online research products were taxable as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-Ireland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, instead of being treated as business income.
Analysis: The appeals involved identical facts to earlier assessment years in the assessee's own case. The subscription model enabled Indian customers to access research products through the internet against fees paid under service agreements. The assessment authorities recharacterised the receipts as royalty, and the appellate authorities had followed prior Tribunal orders which had already upheld the same treatment for earlier years. The Tribunal noted that the issue had repeatedly been decided against the assessee on the basis of consistency and the earlier binding view taken in the assessee's own case, including the conclusion that the receipts fell within the scope of royalty under the domestic law and the treaty.
Conclusion: The subscription receipts were correctly assessed as royalty and not as business income; the issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.