DTAA protection for non-resident payments: no TDS liability where business profits are not taxable in India without a permanent establishment

Payments made to non-residents were held not chargeable to tax in India where the department failed to show a permanent establishment in India and the applicable DTAA treated the receipts as business profits taxable only in the state of residence. Compensation paid to a Malaysian company for non-fulfilment of an export contract was therefore outside section 195, and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not stand. The same approach applied to a quality rebate paid to a UK company on export sales, which was treated as a sales discount rather than separately taxable income. In both matters, the disallowances were deleted and full relief was granted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether compensation paid to a Malaysian non-resident for non-fulfilment of an export contract was chargeable to tax in India so as to attract tax deduction at source under section 195 and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia); (ii) Whether quality rebate paid to a UK non-resident on export sales was liable for tax deduction at source and consequent disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).

Issue (i): Whether compensation paid to a Malaysian non-resident for non-fulfilment of an export contract was chargeable to tax in India so as to attract tax deduction at source under section 195 and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).

Analysis: The payment arose from a trading transaction and was made as compensation for the assessee's failure to supply export goods. The recipient was a Malaysian company and no permanent establishment in India was shown. Under Article VII of the India-Malaysia DTAA, business profits of a resident of one contracting state are taxable only in that state unless attributable to a permanent establishment in the other state. Since the department did not establish taxability in India, the sum was not a chargeable sum for the purposes of section 195, and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not justified.

Conclusion: The addition on this issue was deleted and the assessee succeeded.

Issue (ii): Whether quality rebate paid to a UK non-resident on export sales was liable for tax deduction at source and consequent disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).

Analysis: The payment was supported by invoices and correspondence showing that it was a quality rebate or discount on sales, reducing the sale value rather than constituting income independently taxable in India. The recipient was a foreign company and no permanent establishment in India was established. Applying Article VII of the India-UK DTAA, the amount was treated as business profit not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment, so section 195 did not apply and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The addition on this issue was deleted and the assessee succeeded.

Final Conclusion: The disallowances made for alleged failure to deduct tax at source on both foreign payments were unsustainable, and the assessee obtained full relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a payment to a non-resident is not chargeable to tax in India under the applicable DTAA because the recipient has no permanent establishment in India, section 195 is not attracted and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) cannot be made.

---