TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether compensation payable under an arbitration award to a non-resident foreign buyer was taxable in India so as to attract deduction of tax at source and disallowance under section 40(a); (ii) Whether the ad hoc disallowance out of telephone expenditure was justified.
Issue (i): Whether compensation payable under an arbitration award to a non-resident foreign buyer was taxable in India so as to attract deduction of tax at source and disallowance under section 40(a).
Analysis: The liability arose from a trading contract and the compensation was held to be in the nature of business profits. The foreign buyer had no permanent establishment in India, and the broker involved was treated as an independent broker. In that situation, the compensation was not chargeable to tax in India. The interest component was also treated as part of the award amount and not as a separate taxable liability for the purpose of disallowance.
Conclusion: The disallowance of compensation under section 40(a) was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the ad hoc disallowance out of telephone expenditure was justified.
Analysis: The expenditure was incurred in the business context, and no material was brought on record to show that the telephone use was for non-business purposes. A lump-sum disallowance without identifying any specific non-business element was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The telephone disallowance was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the substantive additions challenged, and the remaining grounds were not pressed, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation arising from a trading contract with a non-resident is not taxable in India where the non-resident has no permanent establishment in India, and in the absence of a chargeable sum there is no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195.
TaxTMI 
