Cenvat credit eligibility for factory repair and modernisation services remains available unless linked to civil construction or support structures.

After the 01.04.2011 amendment to Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, repair, maintenance, fabrication, dismantling, erection and commissioning services remain eligible input services when they are integrally connected with renovation, repair, maintenance or modernisation of a factory or machinery. Credit is disallowed only to the extent the services are shown to be used for construction of a building, civil structure, or foundation/support structure for capital goods. On the stated facts, the record supported the assessee's claim that the services were substantially for existing factory and machinery works, and the demand could survive only for the limited civil-work portion.

---

---

Issues: Whether cenvat credit on repair, maintenance, fabrication, dismantling, erection and commissioning services availed after 01.04.2011 was admissible under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and whether credit was allowable where the services were used for renovation, repair, maintenance or modernisation of the factory or machinery, as distinct from construction of civil structure or support structure.

Analysis: The post-amendment definition of input service retained services used for modernisation, renovation or repairs of a factory or premises, but excluded specified services to the extent used for construction of a building or civil structure, or for laying foundation or making structures for support of capital goods. On the facts, the verification report and contract scrutiny showed that the impugned services were, in substance, linked to repair, maintenance, renovation and modernisation of the existing factory and machinery, with the fabrication and erection components arising after dismantling and not shown to be for civil construction or support structures. The demand could not be sustained on conjecture where the record did not establish that the services fell within the exclusion clause.

Conclusion: Credit was admissible for the services used for renovation, repair, maintenance and modernisation, and inadmissible only to the extent the services related to civil work or support structures. The issue is decided partly in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The impugned demand survives only for the limited civil-work portion, while the remaining denial of cenvat credit is set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: After the 01.04.2011 amendment, fabrication, erection, dismantling and similar services remain eligible as input services when they are integrally connected with renovation, repair, maintenance or modernisation of the factory or machinery, and credit is disallowed only when the services are shown to be used for construction of civil structure or support structure for capital goods.

---