Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight charges paid in respect of coal supplies were includible in the assessee's turnover, and whether the assessee had established that the transactions were either sales in transit by endorsement or transactions undertaken as a commission agent.
Analysis: The exclusion of freight from turnover depended on proof that the freight was not part of the assessee's sale consideration and that the sale had been effected in transit by endorsement of the railway documents, or alternatively that the assessee had acted only as a commission agent. The Tribunal recorded concurrent factual findings that no documentary or other reliable evidence established either plea. Those findings were based on the material on record and did not disclose any legal error warranting revisional interference.
Conclusion: The assessee failed to prove that the freight charges were outside its turnover or that the transactions were sales in transit or commission agency transactions; the Tribunal's findings were upheld.
Final Conclusion: The revision was devoid of merit and the turnover addition relating to freight charges was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where exclusion of freight from turnover is claimed, the assessee must establish the factual basis for the exclusion, and findings of fact supported by evidence are not to be disturbed in revision absent legal error.