Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (7) TMI 1317 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal directs re-adjudication of issues by AO/TPO for appeals, emphasizing natural justice and evidence consideration. The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to re-adjudicate the issues on merits, ensuring compliance with principles ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal directs re-adjudication of issues by AO/TPO for appeals, emphasizing natural justice and evidence consideration.

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to re-adjudicate the issues on merits, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice and proper consideration of all contentions and evidence presented by the assessee.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments.
                            2. Inclusion and exclusion of comparables for benchmarking.
                            3. Use of multiple-year data for benchmarking.
                            4. Consideration of extraordinary costs in determining Arm's Length Price (ALP).
                            5. Disallowance of foreseeable losses.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustments:
                            The assessee challenged the TP adjustments made by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on the Transfer Pricing Officer’s (TPO) order. The primary argument was that the TPO failed to serve a proper show cause notice complying with Section 92CA(3) read with Section 92C(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) dismissed this objection, stating that any deficiency in opportunity was rectified during the DRP proceedings.

                            2. Inclusion and Exclusion of Comparables for Benchmarking:
                            The assessee contested the inclusion of Nitin Fire Protection Industries Ltd. and the exclusion of Kidde India Ltd. as comparables. The TPO rejected Kidde India Ltd. due to its consistent losses and lack of data for the financial year 2009-10. The DRP upheld this rejection, noting Kidde India Ltd.'s substantial related party transactions and changes in business operations. Conversely, the TPO included Nitin Fire Protection Industries Ltd., which the assessee argued was not functionally comparable due to its involvement in manufacturing and trading activities. The DRP directed the TPO to consider both Nitin Fire Protection Industries Ltd. and Kidde India Ltd. with data for FY 2009-10 alone.

                            3. Use of Multiple-Year Data for Benchmarking:
                            The assessee argued for the use of multiple-year data, citing the long-term nature of its projects. The DRP dismissed this argument, referencing the Special Bench decision in M/s. Aztec Software Vs. ACIT, which held that data for the relevant period alone should be considered. The DRP found no specific facts in the assessee's case to justify the use of multiple-year data.

                            4. Consideration of Extraordinary Costs in Determining ALP:
                            The assessee claimed that extraordinary costs incurred due to project delays should be excluded when determining the ALP. The DRP rejected adjustments to the Profit Level Indicator (PLI) of the tested entity, citing various ITAT decisions that such adjustments are not permissible under domestic transfer pricing provisions. The DRP emphasized that adjustments could only be made to comparables, not the tested party itself.

                            5. Disallowance of Foreseeable Losses:
                            The AO disallowed an amount of Rs. 17,61,702/- claimed as foreseeable loss, considering it contingent in nature. The assessee argued that this loss was due to delays in project completion and was accounted for following AS 7 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The DRP dismissed the objection, noting the lack of supporting details to substantiate the claim.

                            Tribunal's Decision:
                            The Tribunal dismissed grounds 1, 2, 3, 9, and 12 as not being pressed by the assessee. For grounds 4-8, 10, and 11, the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication on merits. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to consider all contentions and provide proper and adequate opportunities for the assessee to present evidence and explanations. The decision in ITA no. 1889/Mum/2015 was applied mutatis mutandis to ITA no. 1888/Mum/2015, allowing both appeals for statistical purposes.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to re-adjudicate the issues on merits, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice and proper consideration of all contentions and evidence presented by the assessee.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found