Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned reassessment proceedings should be kept in abeyance pending the outcome of the special leave petitions against the earlier Division Bench orders on entitlement to deduction under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The earlier Division Bench orders holding that cooperative societies of the relevant class were entitled to the benefit of Section 80P were noted to be in force and not stayed or reversed. At the same time, the Court took into account the Revenue's submission that the matter had been carried to the Supreme Court and that, if the Revenue succeeded, fresh reassessment action might be time-barred. In that situation, immediate quashing of the proceedings was considered inappropriate. The Court therefore adopted a conditional course and directed that the impugned proceedings remain in abeyance until the special leave petitions were decided.
Conclusion: The impugned proceedings were not decided on merits, but were kept in abeyance with a conditional direction dependent on the outcome of the special leave petitions.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were disposed of by granting temporary protection against further action, while leaving the underlying tax issue open for revival or final cessation depending on the Supreme Court's decision.