Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (7) TMI 389 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Interpretation of Income Tax Act: Cooperative Societies' Benefits & Validity of Section 148 Notices The court analyzed the interpretation of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, focusing on Cooperative Societies' entitlement to benefits. It assessed ...
                    Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                        Interpretation of Income Tax Act: Cooperative Societies' Benefits & Validity of Section 148 Notices

                        The court analyzed the interpretation of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, focusing on Cooperative Societies' entitlement to benefits. It assessed the validity of notices issued under Section 148, considering previous judgments granting benefits to Cooperative Societies. Emphasizing the relevance of earlier decisions, the court scrutinized limitation periods for notices under Section 148. The judgment provides a comprehensive review of these issues, ensuring a just resolution based on legal provisions and precedents, ultimately safeguarding the rights of the involved parties.




                        Issues involved:
                        - Interpretation of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961
                        - Validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act
                        - Applicability of earlier judgments by the Hon'ble Division Bench
                        - Limitation periods for notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act

                        Detailed Analysis:
                        1. Interpretation of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
                        The judgment revolves around the interpretation of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning Cooperative Societies. The writ petitioners claimed entitlement to the benefits of this section, which led to the issuance of notices under Section 148 of the IT Act. The core argument was that Cooperative Societies, similar to the petitioners, should be granted the benefits outlined in Section 80P. The judgment extensively discusses the legal provisions and the implications of Section 80P on Cooperative Societies.

                        2. Validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act:
                        The validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was challenged by the writ petitioners. These notices were issued based on the assertion that there was income that had escaped assessment. The petitioners contended that the notices were unjustified, especially in light of previous judgments by the Hon'ble Division Bench that Cooperative Societies are entitled to the benefits of Section 80P. The judgment critically evaluates the grounds on which the notices were issued and their compliance with the legal framework.

                        3. Applicability of earlier judgments by the Hon'ble Division Bench:
                        The judgment extensively refers to earlier judgments by the Hon'ble Division Bench, particularly an order dated 02.08.2016, which held that Cooperative Societies akin to the petitioners are entitled to the benefits of Section 80P of the IT Act. The legal arguments presented in these judgments, along with the questions of law raised, form a significant part of the analysis in the current judgment. The court emphasizes the relevance and applicability of these earlier decisions in determining the rights of the petitioners under Section 80P.

                        4. Limitation periods for notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act:
                        A crucial aspect of the judgment pertains to the limitation periods associated with notices issued under Section 148 of the IT Act. The Revenue department raised concerns about the timelines for issuing fresh notices if the current notices were set aside. The judgment delves into the provisions of the IT Act related to limitation periods, highlighting the complexities and implications of these timelines on the legal proceedings. The court carefully considers these arguments in the context of the case at hand to arrive at a reasoned decision.

                        In conclusion, the judgment provides a detailed analysis of the issues surrounding the interpretation of Section 80P, the validity of notices under Section 148, the significance of earlier judgments by the Hon'ble Division Bench, and the implications of limitation periods on the legal proceedings. The court's decision reflects a thorough examination of the legal framework and precedents to ensure a just and equitable resolution for the parties involved.
                        Full Summary is available for active users!
                        Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                        Topics

                        ActsIncome Tax
                        No Records Found