Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee's Reasonable Cause Exempts LTA Tax Penalty</h1> <h3>Syndicate Bank, NGV Koramangala, Bangalore, Syndicate Bank, NGV Yelhanka, Bangalore, Syndicate Bank, Ganganagar, Bangalore Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Range 3, Bangalore.</h3> The Tribunal found that the Assessee had a reasonable cause for not deducting tax at source on Leave Travel Allowance (LTA) involving foreign travel, ... Penalty u/s. 271-C - LTA exemption for TDS under head salary - High Court has admitted the question whether the Assessee is guilty of non deduction of tax at source or not - debatable issue - HELD THAT:- M/S. ANKITA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD. [2015 (3) TMI 1029 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] as held mere admission of the appeal by the High Court on the substantial questions of law as have been quoted above, would make it apparent that the additions made were debatable. The Tribunal has thus rightly held that the admission of substantial questions of law by the High Court leads credence to the bona fide of the assessee and therefore, the penalty is not exigible under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Merely because the claim of the assessee has been rejected by the revenue authorities would not make the assessee liable for penalty - levy of penalty u/s.271C of the Act, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, cannot be sustained and the same is directed to be deleted. As far as the decision of the co-ordinate Bench in the case of Syndicate Bank [2019 (7) TMI 1163 - ITAT BANGALORE] is concerned, we are of the view that this issue has not been raised nor considered in that case. Since the imposition of penalty u/s.271C fails on this ground, we are of the view that there is no necessity to remand the issue to CIT(A) for consideration afresh, as was done by the Tribunal in the case referred to by the learned DR. We therefore hold that the imposition of penalty in the facts and circumstances of the case cannot be justified and the same is directed to be cancelled. Issues Involved:1. Validity of imposition of penalty on the Assessee under Section 271-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for failure to deduct tax at source on Leave Travel Allowance (LTA) reimbursements.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Imposition of Penalty Under Section 271-C:Background:The appeals were filed by three branches of Syndicate Bank against the orders of CIT(A)-6, Bengaluru, concerning the imposition of penalties under Section 271-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue revolved around the Assessee's failure to deduct tax at source on LTA reimbursements for journeys undertaken outside India.Legal Framework:- Section 10(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Provides for the exemption of LTA for travel within India.- Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1961: Specifies conditions under which LTA is exempt, limiting the exemption to actual travel costs within India.- Section 271-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Imposes penalties for failure to deduct tax at source.- Section 273B of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Provides that no penalty shall be imposed if there was a reasonable cause for the failure to deduct tax.Facts:The Assessee reimbursed LTA to its employees for journeys that included travel outside India but did not deduct tax at source, believing that the ultimate destination being India qualified for exemption under Section 10(5). A survey conducted under Section 133A revealed this non-compliance, leading to the imposition of penalties under Section 271-C.Arguments:- Assessee's Argument: The Assessee contended that the failure to deduct tax was based on a reasonable belief that LTA was exempt if the final destination was within India, even if the journey included foreign travel. They argued that the admission of substantial questions of law by the High Court indicated that the issue was debatable, thereby negating the imposition of penalties.- Revenue's Argument: The Revenue maintained that the Assessee was liable to deduct tax at source for LTA involving foreign travel, as the exemption under Section 10(5) was limited to travel within India. They emphasized that the Assessee's interpretation was incorrect and penalties were justified.Judicial Precedents:- Supreme Court in CIT, New Delhi Vs. M/s Eli Lilly & Company (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.: Highlighted that penalties under Section 271-C are not automatic and can be waived if there is a reasonable cause for the failure to deduct tax.- Karnataka High Court in The Commissioner of Income Tax and Others Vs. The Rajajinagar Co-operative Bank Limited: Held that a bona fide mistake in interpreting tax provisions can constitute a reasonable cause under Section 273B, thereby exempting the Assessee from penalties.Tribunal's Findings:- The Tribunal noted that the Assessee's appeal against the quantum proceedings was admitted by the Karnataka High Court, indicating that the issue was debatable.- The Tribunal relied on the Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT v. Ankita Electronics Pvt. Ltd., which held that the admission of substantial questions of law by the High Court lends credence to the bona fides of the Assessee and precludes the imposition of penalties.- The Tribunal also considered the ITAT Jaipur Bench's decision in State Bank of India Vs. ACIT, which dealt with a similar issue and concluded that the Assessee had a reasonable cause for not deducting tax at source on LTA involving foreign travel.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the Assessee had a reasonable cause for the failure to deduct tax at source, based on a bona fide belief that LTA was exempt if the final destination was within India. Consequently, the imposition of penalties under Section 271-C was not justified, and the penalties were directed to be deleted.Final Order:The appeals were allowed, and the penalties imposed under Section 271-C were cancelled. The judgment emphasized that the Assessee's interpretation, although incorrect, was made in good faith and was supported by substantial legal debate, thereby constituting a reasonable cause under Section 273B.Pronouncement:The judgment was pronounced in the open court on July 19, 2019.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found