Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petitions, underscores judicial authority The SC, with Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, declined to entertain multiple Special Leave Petitions under ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petitions, underscores judicial authority
The SC, with Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, declined to entertain multiple Special Leave Petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, after condoning the delay. The Court dismissed the petitions, exercising its discretion not to grant leave to appeal, and disposed of any pending applications. This decision brings finality to the issue and highlights the Court's authority in deciding on such matters.
Issues: Dismissal of Special Leave Petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The Supreme Court, comprising of Hon'ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee, in the matter involving multiple Special Leave Petitions, decided not to entertain the petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Court, after condoning the delay, dismissed the Special Leave Petitions. This decision signifies the Court's discretion in choosing not to grant leave to appeal in these matters. The order also mentions the disposal of any pending applications related to the petitions. The judgment succinctly concludes the Court's decision on the matter, thereby providing finality to the issue at hand.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
