High Court allows appeal delay, directs registration, and grants condonation. Tribunal quashes order, cites lack of enquiry. Principal CIT's order faulted, matter remanded for thorough reconsideration.

The High Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, directed the department to register it, and allowed the application for condonation of delay. The tribunal quashed the order under Section 263 due to lack of enquiry by the Assessing Officer and based on the decision in a previous case. The Court found fault with the Principal CIT's order for not conducting a proper enquiry and remanded the matter for de novo consideration, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the issues raised.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Delay in filing appeal
2. Validity of order under Section 263
3. Lack of enquiry by Assessing Officer
4. Applicability of previous tribunal decision
5. Remand of the matter for de novo consideration

1. Delay in filing appeal:
The High Court noted the delay in filing the appeal and condoned it after sufficient cause was shown. The department was directed to register the appeal immediately, and the application for condonation of delay was allowed.

2. Validity of order under Section 263:
The impugned order under Section 263 by the Principal CIT was challenged for not providing a finding on how the Assessing Officer's order was erroneous on merits. The tribunal held that lack of enquiry by the Assessing Officer without putting the assessee on notice rendered the order liable to be quashed. The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee based on the decision in a previous case.

3. Lack of enquiry by Assessing Officer:
The tribunal found fault with the Principal CIT's order under Section 263 for not conducting a proper enquiry and setting aside the order without giving a conclusion on the merits of the issue raised in the notice. This lack of enquiry was a crucial factor in the decision to quash the order.

4. Applicability of previous tribunal decision:
The tribunal applied the decision of a Coordinate Bench in a prior case to the present situation, stating that the impugned order under Section 263 was liable to be quashed based on the principles established in the previous ruling. The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in line with this interpretation.

5. Remand of the matter for de novo consideration:
The High Court expressed a tentative view to remand the matter back to the tribunal for de novo consideration, as it observed that the tribunal had not decided the question itself or remanded the matter previously. The Court directed the advocate-on-record to notify the respondent of this appeal and the intent to remand the matter for further consideration.

In conclusion, the High Court addressed the delay in filing the appeal, scrutinized the validity of the order under Section 263, highlighted the lack of enquiry by the Assessing Officer, discussed the applicability of a previous tribunal decision, and considered remanding the matter for de novo consideration. The decision to remand the matter was based on the Court's observation that the tribunal had not adequately addressed the issues raised in the appeal, necessitating further examination.

---