High Court rules investment profit exempt, TDS on foreign payments, Section 115JB inapplicable to insurers.

The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in the case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, holding that profit on the sale of investments is exempt. The Court also upheld decisions regarding TDS on payments to surveyors outside India, the inapplicability of Section 115JB to insurance companies, and TDS on commission for re-insurance premium, all decided against the Revenue. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Profit on sale of investments.
2. TDS on payments to surveyors outside India.
3. Applicability of Section 115JB to insurance companies.
4. TDS on commission paid for re-insurance premium.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Profit on Sale of Investments
The core question was whether the profit on the sale of investments is exempt. The High Court of Delhi in the case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax analyzed Rule 5(b) of the First Schedule to the Income-tax Act, which was omitted by Finance Act, 1988 and reintroduced by Finance Act, 2009 effective from April 1, 2011. The rationale for omitting Rule 5(b) was to exempt profits and gains in investments by the General Insurance Corporation of India and related companies. The Court noted that the 2009 amendment aligned with IRDA Regulations, requiring non-life insurance companies to include profit or loss on the realization/sale of investments in their Profit and Loss Account. This requirement applied from AY 2011-12, and prior to April 1, 2011, there was no provision for disallowing the deduction of loss on the sale of investments. The CIT(A) and the Tribunal had taken a similar view in the respondent/assessee's case. The High Court agreed with the Delhi High Court's decision, answering this question against the Revenue.

Issue 2: TDS on Payments to Surveyors Outside India
The Tribunal's decision that the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source on payments to surveyors outside India was upheld. A Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited had previously considered and decided this question against the Revenue.

Issue 3: Applicability of Section 115JB
The question was whether Section 115JB, which allows companies to compute book profit, applies to insurance companies. This issue was also addressed by a Division Bench in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited and further in The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited. Both decisions held that Section 115JB does not apply to insurance companies, and this view was upheld against the Revenue.

Issue 4: TDS on Commission for Re-insurance Premium
The Tribunal's decision that the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source on the commission paid for re-insurance premium was also upheld. This issue was similarly decided against the Revenue in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited.

Conclusion:
The appeals were dismissed, and all substantial questions of law were answered against the Revenue. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed, and no costs were awarded.

---