Reinsurance premium to non-resident reinsurers not taxable, no TDS required under section 195

ITAT Chennai allowed assessee's appeal regarding TDS under section 195, holding that reinsurance premium ceded to non-resident reinsurers is not taxable in India under Income Tax Act or DTAA, thus no disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS. Court upheld disallowance of IBNR/IBNER provisions as unascertained liability not deductible under section 37(1), but restricted disallowance to amounts debited to profit and loss account. MAT computation issues regarding IBNR/IBNER provisions were remanded to AO for fresh adjudication. Court deleted section 14A disallowance while computing book profit under section 115JB, following Special Bench decision. Various other grounds including PF contribution delays and infra payments were decided based on established precedents.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing appeals.
2. Disallowance of reinsurance premium ceded to non-resident reinsurers (NRRs).
3. Disallowance of amortization of premium paid on purchase of securities.
4. Disallowance of provision for IBNR and IBNER.
5. Disallowance of provision for Reserve for Unexpired Risk (URR) while computing book profit u/s 115JB.
6. Disallowance of exempt income by invoking section 14A read with Rule 8D while computing book profit u/s 115JB.
7. Disallowance of commission paid to non-residents u/s 40(a)(i).
8. Disallowance of expenditure incurred for survey fees paid to non-residents.
9. Disallowance of amount paid to motor car dealers towards infra payment u/s 37.
10. Non-adjudication of certain issues by CIT(A).

Detailed Analysis:

1. Condonation of Delay:
- The Tribunal condoned delays in filing appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue, considering the sufficient cause shown for the period of delay. The appeals were admitted for adjudication.

2. Reinsurance Premium:
- The Tribunal held that reinsurance premium ceded to NRRs is not taxable in India under the Income Tax Act or under DTAA between India and respective countries. Consequently, the premium cannot be disallowed under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS under section 195. This decision was consistent with earlier rulings in the assessee's own case.

3. Amortization of Premium:
- The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of amortization of premium paid on purchase of securities, following previous decisions against the assessee for earlier assessment years. The amortization was not considered deductible under the relevant provisions.

4. Provision for IBNR and IBNER:
- The Tribunal ruled that provision for IBNR and IBNER is not deductible under section 37(1) as it represents an unascertained liability. However, for the assessment year 2017-18, the Tribunal directed the AO to recalculate the disallowance, restricting it to the amounts debited to the profit and loss account.

5. Reserve for Unexpired Risk (URR):
- The Tribunal remanded the issue of URR back to the AO to determine whether the provision is an ascertained liability for the purpose of computing book profit under section 115JB. The Tribunal noted that the issue had not been fully adjudicated by the lower authorities.

6. Exempt Income and Section 14A:
- The Tribunal, following the Special Bench decision in ACIT vs. Vireet Investments, held that provisions of section 14A read with Rule 8D do not apply while computing book profit under section 115JB. The disallowance made by the AO was deleted.

7. Commission Paid to Non-Residents:
- The Tribunal confirmed that the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source on commission payments to non-residents, as these payments were made to entities without a permanent establishment in India. This decision was consistent with the jurisdictional High Court's ruling.

8. Survey Fees Paid to Non-Residents:
- The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction of survey fees paid to non-residents, as the services were rendered outside India and the non-residents had no business connection in India.

9. Infra Payment to Motor Car Dealers:
- The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s decision to allow infra payments made to motor car dealers, following the High Court's ruling that the Revenue could exercise its authority if the service tax department held against the assessee.

10. Non-Adjudication of Issues:
- The Tribunal remanded several issues back to the CIT(A) for adjudication, as they were not addressed in the original appeal. These included credits for taxes paid, interest levied, and certain additions in the tax computation sheet.

In conclusion, the Tribunal provided a comprehensive analysis of each issue, often relying on precedents and consistent rulings in the assessee's own case, while remanding certain issues for further examination by the lower authorities.

---